CRITICISM OF RELIGION

It seems clear that many people wrong in the world, or is it one or the other; if there is a god not many or none, if we are not going to hell reincarnate, or not a virgin or a powder glued.

The explanations of the film that do are often different but have similarities. The easiest is attributed to the existence of one or more beings all or quasi almighty already there before. But the common factor is faith.

John Locke said all sects use blatantly reason as it helps them, and when it ceases to rely to establish something that impudently host is a matter of faith and that is above reason. Faith. Believe in what you do not see. And children are instilled faith is good and necessary. But not everything that is not, only in what you say.

And now let us for a moment the general view of religion and centrémonos in the majority in Spain, not in the world. The Catholic.

DOCUMENTS HISTORICAL The ON RELIGIOUS Jesucristo

As in many religions, books containing doctrine are sacred, and this proves that tell the truth about the God or the Gods, and therefore are sacred; forming a loop-hen egg.

The Old Testament is shared by Christians and Jews; the main difference is that the former were excised from the latter to believe there was a man who was God, fulfilling prophecy.

In those days, for him that he read, fueron los muchos that autodenominaron mesías, as there was some anticipation for the prophecy. One of them must be John the Baptist.

Pero the existing historical documents on religious Aquel tiempo but that demuestren there that existió Jesucristo, We have to go the year 100 onwards to find. Es un this theme en el que no hay only Acts verifiable pero si una gran intentionality en cuanto lo quiera demonstrate that.

Lo mismo con los ocurre Gospels, that were not written by the apostles as they think. Los Gospels debieron escribirse between el 70 and 150 D.C.. the first being the Mark and the rest by copying much of this. El minimum del año 70 viene ahí ocurrió given because of her destrucción Jerusalem, narrated by them Gospels; si bien authors who missed the han han considered them Gospels earlier and knew presage the subsequent destruction of Jerusalem...

Unfortunately Jesus did not have a blog as I. We're talking about your alleged facts were narrated between 40 and 120 years of distance from what is related, and in a time in which no Internet, or press, or newspaper archives ....

Obviously they had all leave plot to lay the foundation of a legend that could no longer be contrasted, and convenience could be created.
....................

LOSE YOUR FAITH IN 10 MINUTES.

We in the Christian worldview.

The explanations offered have always been absolute truth, whose doubt was long punished by fire. Until it will be obvious that there are. It turns out that they were metaphors.

Adan and Eve were unquestioned until well after a man named Darwin demonstrated that. But then it turned out it was like a tale for pastors, so they could understand. The world was made in seven days, one for the light, another for animals etc.. Until it was demonstrated that took millions of years. But it was a way of speaking.

What was done right now is mythology.

But still most surely other explanations for very questionable church. I wonder how he Noe find a pair of each species, and even more difficult, put them in your boat. Today they claim to have located this boat in a military zone between Turkey and Armenia. I also wonder who all spoke a common language before the Tower of Babel (that bitch was that). Not to mention what it opened the Red Sea, from heaven that God spoke to Moses, of multiplication of the loaves and fishes, that Christ walked on water, that Arise and walk etc.

Also an archangel came down from heaven and gave Muhammad the Quran, and that if it should be true, as to where he got to know if there, because it was uneducated.

Almost all religions have their "miracles", and these are the ones that show that it is the true religion. And all are unquestionable. E unprovable.

Now, in Spain most people do not question their faith approaches. But there are many Catholics who are not at all clear that the Bible stories offered to explain the undeniable miracle: we are here.

However consider that religion is good, because they agree with his moral code, creen que lleva a hacer el bien.

But I'm convinced that there are more in keeping with the teachings of the Bible with those of other religions. In fact I think they disagree with most things.

It is perverse sex outside reproductive intention?, is wrong to use condoms? It's the right thing to turn the other cheek when you get a host? Children are born with original sin stained to be cleaned by baptism? Masturbation is a sin? It should be the role of women which emanates from the Bible? Is blessed you walked, being robbed, you insult? You have to give to Caesar what I ask?

Possibly not, but if you have to do good, be pious, generous to forgive.

At the end, the pink is just the number, y todas las creencias of the pack Surviving solo unas cuantas, por cierto that are common in almost todas las religions as well as on them Short courses of ethics.

I think that there's a couple of reasons to be dealing with the gente en las religions that basically I do not think, neither them nor las fait relatados normace morales.

One is the social functions, we can not go in the hole muerto sin more, NECESITAMOS someone entierros hable them in a life of mejor y haga an appropriate homage; give weddings that pomp and circumstance, not to mention the social function of the Masses, especially in the villages.

The other is psychological, God is the perfect invisible friend whom we can not count, who ask for what we fail, of whom receive comfort when something goes wrong. And above all, we are unable to admit our ephemeral nature; must have an eternal life. Be aware that die and desparecemos is a heavy burden.

Also, there is a predisposition to believe. There are people who believe in almost everything. If you believe in reincarnation do not say you're a Christian, and if you're Christian does not believe in aliens, or spirits.

HISTORY OF THE CHURCHES

The various churches, the alleged links between land and sky, between the gods and men.

Certainly there are people of good will who are involved with a religion and seek to do good. But the churches have historically acted so nothing altruistic.

Church and monarchy were always natural allies. And they have helped to get as many privileges could. The church was "channeling" the divine, and thus legitimizes the monarchs. Its privileged status they are kings untouchable "by the grace of God".

Just as Franco, the coup to thank the church knew it nominase "Caudillo of Spain by the grace of God".

It also helped the church monarchs, ground of its legitimacy, and on the other hand also gave them the best weapon at their disposal to appease the people. Religion, as said Karl Marx, "The opium of the people".

PHOTO Moissac

The message I wanted to give the church is very clear on this porch of the Cathedral of Moissac, (place by the way in which I was very happy, without going into details)

The Last Judgment. "Let's see", said a Christ dreaded above all, "Those who have done as I (church) tell right, with all these saints with bored face. Those who have not listened to the left, donde estos monstruos con cuernos y rabo cuecen en calderas a las personas que llegan”.

Blessed ye that quedáis nothing, because in the next life will be all great!

And so the church got to be in the privileged social strata, by the nobility. Although clear, within the churches also had many layers, but still meeting the rule: against higher the better is lived.

Thus the church lived to tax, abusive to some impoverished peasants, tithes in Europe, tenth of what was produced only for the church, besides other taxes.

But there were other ways to get rich. When they gave the extreme unctions, quite often getting into productive land legacy for the church in exchange for a recommendation for San Pedro. In the century Spain XIX, for when the confiscation of Mendizabal, one-third of the land was in the hands of the church!

Another way they could make a living was by the Inquisition, political tool of the monarchy. At times boring, when there was no one to burn, lived converts collected bribes and other suspects.

And it must be said, which together with the ambition and nationalisms, religion is to blame for almost all the wars of history. Especially the Spanish, Sword of Rome stupid, where our history is full of wars against the Protestant, Turkish and Moorish grievance without difference of religion, that fear of different.

The tremendous wealth that Spain brought America was spent on financing wars against Protestants and Moors, and to build our majestic cathedrals, at a time when the common people starved.

And what about baptisms and communions? Every culture seeks its pretexts for parties. From circumcision to the first rule or the coming-out party. They are social events to strengthen social ties and economic power display, Nobody celebrates the entrance to the church baby.

But the church uses to instill their beliefs to children in the most vulnerable time is the reason, in that age when the heads are ductile and opinions are formed, and are accepted as some amazing things, as that the earth is round and that before we were monkeys. Just as do the churches of other religions.